Matt Walsh hit with JQ gotcha question:
The guy asking the question came across terribly. This bad approach lets people handwave the JQ as a baseless schizo topic.
Doing IRL stuff is not the same as posting online for an audience of people who are already interested in "far-right" politics. It requires a lot of tact and good optics.
You can't run on stage and shout "WELL WHAT ABOUT THE BERGSTEINS?" expecting to win over an audience of people who are still in the shallow end of breaking the conditioning.
Walsh is doing great work turning a lot of normal people against Leftist gender stuff and, unlike many other mainstream conservatives, he has the balls to expose the anti-White agenda too.
Yes, we know who pays Walsh and why he won't touch the JQ, but the Right needs people who are "clean" in this regard and capable of shifting the Overton window without being completely deplatformed and unpersoned as a hateful Nazi bigot.
The guy asking the question came across terribly. This bad approach lets people handwave the JQ as a baseless schizo topic.
Doing IRL stuff is not the same as posting online for an audience of people who are already interested in "far-right" politics. It requires a lot of tact and good optics.
You can't run on stage and shout "WELL WHAT ABOUT THE BERGSTEINS?" expecting to win over an audience of people who are still in the shallow end of breaking the conditioning.
Walsh is doing great work turning a lot of normal people against Leftist gender stuff and, unlike many other mainstream conservatives, he has the balls to expose the anti-White agenda too.
Yes, we know who pays Walsh and why he won't touch the JQ, but the Right needs people who are "clean" in this regard and capable of shifting the Overton window without being completely deplatformed and unpersoned as a hateful Nazi bigot.